literature review包含几个部分

2024-11-02 22:39:09
推荐回答(5个)
回答1:

Literature Review(文献综述)包含以下三个部分:

1、Introduction。这方面主要是对背景的介绍,在外国学术上介绍如下:

不要与书评相混淆,文献综述调查与特定问题,研究领域或理论相关的学术文章,书籍和其他来源(eq论文,会议论文集),提供每项工作的描述,总结和批判性评价 ,目的是提供关于某个主题的重要文献的概述。

2、Components。这部分是Review的主体部分,需要包括话题的论证介绍。

文献综述应包括以下要素:对所考虑的主题,问题或理论的概述,以及文献审查的目标,对正在审查的工作分类(例如支持特定职位的那些,反对的那些,以及那些 完全提供替代论文)解释每项工作如何与其他工作相似以及如何与其他工作有所不同关于哪些部分在其论文中得到最佳考虑的结论是最有说服力的。

3、Definition and Use/Purpose。这部分主要写整个Review的总体定义和用途,需要简明地说出其功能用途:

文献综述可能构成论文或论文的重要篇章,也可能是对某一主题着作的独立评论。 无论是哪种情况,其目的都是:将每项工作置于其对理解所审查主题的贡献的背景下。描述每项工作与正在考虑的其他工作之间的关系确定新的解释方式,并阐明其中的任何差距。 以前的研究。

解决之前看似矛盾的先前研究之间的冲突确定先前奖学金的领域以防止重复工作为未来研究指明前进的方向在现有文献的背景下放置一个人的原创作品(在论文或学位论文的情况下)。

扩展资料:

Literature Review是文献综述,注重对文献信息的整合和分析,并在文字中体现如下的一些要点:

1、针对所选话题,描述已有文献都做出了什么样的成果。

2、对一些关键的概念和理论进行概述和梳理。

3、辨别各篇文献之间的联系和采用的研究方法。

4、找出已有研究的优点和缺点。

5、找出已有研究的空缺点。

6、找出已有研究的矛盾点或争议点。

7、为你的论文提供一个可靠的研究背景和扎实的研究基础。

参考资料:文献综述-百度百科

回答2:

Literature Review(文献综述)包含以下三个部分:

1.Introduction。这方面主要是对背景的介绍,在外国学术上介绍如下:

Not to be confused with a book review, a literature review surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources (e.q. dissertations, conference proceedings) relevant to a particularissue, area of research, or theory, providing a description, summary, and critical evaluationof each work, The purpose is to offer an overview of significant literature published on a topic.

2.Components。这部分是Review的主体部分,需要包括话题的论证介绍

Literature reviews should comprise the following elements: An overview of the subject, issue or theory under consideration, along with the objectives of the literature review Division of works under review into categories (e.g. those in support of a particular position, those against, and those offering alternative theses entirely) Explanation of how each work is similar to and how it varies from the others Conclusions as to which pieces are best considered in their arqument, are most convincing

3.Definition and Use/Purpose。这部分主要写整个Review的总体定义和用途,需要简明地说出其功能用途:

A literature review may constitute an essential chapter of a thesis or dissertation, or may be a self-contained review of writings on a subject. In either case, its purpose is to: Place each work in the context of its contribution to the understanding of the subject under review Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration Identify new ways to interpret, and shed light on any gaps in, previous research. Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort Point the way forward for further research Place one“s original work (in the case of theses or dissertations) in the context of existing literature

拓展资料:

1.文献综述简称综述,是对某一领域,某一专业或某一方面的课题,问题或研究专题搜集大量相关资料,通过分析,阅读,整理,提炼当前课题,问题或研究专题的最新进展,学术见解或建议,做出综合性介绍和阐述的一种学术论文。

2.文献综述是在确定了选题后,在对选题所涉及的研究领域的文献进行广泛阅读和理解的基础上,对该研究领域的研究现状(包括主要学术观点、前人研究成果和研究水平、争论焦点、存在的问题及可能的原因等)、新水平、新动态、新技术和新发现、发展前景等内容进行综合分析、归纳整理和评论,并提出自己的见解和研究思路而写成的一种不同于毕业论文的文体。

3.它要求作者既要对所查阅资料的主要观点进行综合整理、陈述,还要根据自己的理解和认识,对综合整理后的文献进行比较专门的、全面的、深入的、系统的论述和相应的评价,而不仅仅是相关领域学术研究的“堆砌”。

4.文献综述根据研究的目的不同,可分为基本文献综述和高级文献综述两种。基本文献综述是对有关研究课题的现有知识进行总结和评价,以陈述现有知识的状况;高级文献综述则是在选择研究兴趣和主题之后,对相关文献进行回顾,确立研究论题,再提出进一步的研究,从而建立一个研究项目。

参考资料:文献综述-百度百科

回答3:

你现在是要写literature review吧。老师布置的,还是要写。一楼那个直接进入正题了,不叫literature review.

Literature review的意思就是你要看看别人已经在你的话题上作了那些研究。人家的论点和你的论点不一定要相同(最好有正有反-你要看看人家写出那些东西了,一来你更了解你的话题,二来可以把话题的范围缩小一点,太广了不容易写全),而且也要致力达到你做的东西不要和别人已经研究出来的东西大同小异。现在这阶段不用写你自己的论点想法,主要写人家已经有了什么想法。

一般,Introduction几句话,写写你review了什么方面的资料,中心主题(你想问的问题)是什么。
中间写你对资料的总结和想法,一般可以以时间规划(如先写1800年代的,后写1900年代的),以论点规划等等。
结尾写你现在有什么体会,在看了这些资料之后,你觉得你自己的话题研究方向会往那个方向走。

最后给你几个参考链接。前面两个主要是介绍literature review到底是什么回事,第三个是一个sample literature review.
http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/literature_review.html
http://library.ucsc.edu/help/howto/write-a-literature-review
例子:http://faculty.mwsu.edu/psychology/Laura.Spiller/Experimental/sample_apa_style_litreview.pdf

回答4:

不要写introduction,literature review 一般只要一两百字,主要介绍一下你要写的东西目前已经有那些人写过,研究出了什么成果,有那些值得借鉴的地方,还有那些是值得你论述的,大概就是这样。

回答5:

This guide is the first of three looking at the purpose and process of conducting a literature review. It includes advice on:
Why write a literature review?
New discoveries don't materialise out of nowhere; they build upon the findings of previous experiments and investigations. A literature review shows how the investigation you are conducting fits with what has gone before and puts it into context.
A literature review demonstrates to your reader that you are able to:
• Understand and critically analyse the background research
• Select and source the information that is necessary to develop a context for your research
It also:
• Shows how your investigation relates to previous research
• Reveals the contribution that your investigation makes to this field (fills a gap, or builds on existing research, for instance)
• Provides evidence that may help explain your findings later
If you are doing a thesis, dissertation, or a long report it is likely that you will need to include a literature review. If you are doing a lab write-up or a shorter report, some background reading may be required to give context to your work, but this is usually included as an analysis in the introduction and discussion sections.
What is a literature review?
A literature review is a select analysis of existing research which is relevant to your topic, showing how it relates to your investigation. It explains and justifies how your investigation may help answer some of the questions or gaps in this area of research.
A literature review is not a straightforward summary of everything you have read on the topic and it is not a chronological description of what was discovered in your field.
A longer literature review may have headings to help group the relevant research into themes or topics. This gives a focus to your analysis, as you can group similar studies together and compare and contrast their approaches, any weaknesses or strengths in their methods, and their findings.
One common way to approach a literature review is to start out broad and then become more specific.
• First briefly explain the broad issues related to your investigation; you don't need to write much about this, just demonstrate that you are aware of the breadth of your subject.
• Then narrow your focus to deal with the studies that overlap with your research.
• Finally, hone in on any research which is directly related to your specific investigation. Proportionally you spend most time discussing those studies which have most direct relevance to your research.
How do I get started?
Start by identifying what you will need to know to inform your research:
• What research has already been done on this topic?
• What are the sub-areas of the topic you need to explore?
• What other research (perhaps not directly on the topic) might be relevant to your investigation?
• How do these sub-topics and other research overlap with your investigation?
Note down all your initial thoughts on the topic. You can use a spidergram or list to help you identify the areas you want to investigate further. It is important to do this before you start reading so that you don't waste time on unfocussed and irrelevant reading.
Searching for sources
It's easy to think that the best way to search for texts is to use the Internet - to 'Google it'. There are useful online tools that you may use, like Google Scholar. However, for most literature reviews you will need to focus on academically authoritative texts like academic books, journals, research reports, government publications. Searching Google will give you thousands of hits, few of them authoritative, and you will waste time sorting through them.
A better idea is to use databases. These are available through the Library in paper and electronic (usually online) forms.
Use journal articles: They normally have the most up-to-date research and you will be expected to refer to them in your literature review.
You may find review articles that survey developments in your field. These are very useful for identifying relevant sources - but do go back to the original texts and develop your own critical analysis if possible.
Another good way to find sources is to look at the reference lists in articles or books already identified as relevant to your topic. You will be expected to prioritise recent research, but it's also important to acknowledge the standard texts in your field. An easy way to identify these is to check reference lists to see which texts are frequently cited.